Interesting insights from Homeaway.com at the Travolution Summit
For those that follow me on twitter (@bencolclough) you would have seen a flurry of messages yesterday about the Travolution summit. The summit was a fantastic event where a bunch of smart people in the world of online travel got together and listened to some great presentations.
For me the highlight of the day was Chief Exec of Homeaway.com. For those that don’t know it yet, Homeaway.com is a huge conglomeration of sites with over 360,000 vacation rental properties on its books. It has serious VC wonga behind it, and has grown aggressively by hoovering up loads of smaller local vacation rental sites. By its own admission it still has only aprox. 10% of global properties on its books. The presentation raised three thoughts for me:
- There are still significant untapped niches in travel: Despite the fact that travel is the second most mature online industry (I’m not mentioning the first), there are still untapped niche markets with huge value. So whilst VCs have helped fund countless fancy travel apps and social networks, big money remains on the table for those brave enough to roll up their sleeves and get their hands dirty. Consolidating supply of rental homes isn’t necessarily glamorous work but there is money in it, and it meets a real unmet customer need. I would count the adventure travel market which Tourdust.com operates in as another example (and is actually a larger marketplace than vacation rentals worth aprox. $200B globally)
- Simple is good: I quote “our sites aren’t special”. Homeaway.com boils down to offering as much product coverage as possible to customers. There truly isn’t anything special about the web site. They even stick with a tried and trusted listings model, owners simply pay aprox $300 per year to list. They are just getting on with the nuts and bolts of meeting an unmet customer need, simply working on getting that sales and marketing machine turning over nicely. A lot of start-ups would benefit hugely (Tourdust.com included) from looking at homeaway.com as a case study of focussing on simplicity not the latest sexy social app which might get us a cheap and dirty traffic spike from Techcrunch or Mashable.
- M&A in online businesses: I’m intrigued how an online business can make M&A pay. The theory is that in an ideal market, when you acquire another company you pay fairly for the value of their future revenue streams. So if you can’t squeeze some some extra margins by combining forces then the deal won’t cover its costs (lawyers, financiers etc.). This would typically mean reducing staffing overhead, so combine marketing teams and support functions etc. I can’t see these savings being significant in the online world because HQ teams tend to be very very small. Likewise it doesn’t make sense to shut the old site down due to the google link juice it will have built up over the years. So where are the synergies? Maybe it is simply a case of saving on the sales costs it would take for homeaway to recruit all the properties on the target’s books directly? For example, if it costs Homeaway.com an average of $30 to acquire a new rental home to the network (via sales or marketing channels), then acquiring a site like homelidays with 40,000 properties on its books saves homeaway an investment of only $1.2m in sales & marketing (assuming there is no overlap in the portfolios).
The presentation by Tripadvisor: What struck me most, despite their obvious success in social media is that they still refer to their review content as "their's". If I had contributed a review to tripadvisor, I would quite firmly believe that content was mine not tripadvisor’s.
Frommer’s research report: The key point they tried to hammer home was that consumer’s want to see information on a destination when they are browsing online travel agents. Add to this that Google doesn’t want you to have the same content as everyone else and you get the crazy result of a million and one different destination articles written about the same topic. How can that add net value to the overall economy?



